Same answers.
One-fifth the tokens.

Most RAG pipelines pay the LLM to read noise. This page shows what happens when a Dell PowerEdge R470 reranks the retrieval: wider search, sharper selection, and an 80% smaller context bill with better recall.

Start here
New to RAG? Start here A 60-second primer on how an AI finds answers in your documents.

Here is the short version of what happens under the hood for RAG retrieval, so the rest of this page makes sense.

1

Documents are cut into chunks

Manuals, wikis, and tickets all get split into bite-size passages of about 256 tokens (roughly a paragraph). The chunk is the unit of search: small enough to point at a single idea.

2

Every chunk gets coordinates

An embedding model turns each chunk into a point on a map of meaning. Chunks about the same topic land near each other, all searchable in milliseconds.

3

A question retrieves its neighbors

Your question lands on the same map, and the system grabs the K closest chunks, the "top-K." Close in meaning usually means relevant but could mean similar words are used.

4

The LLM reads what you send, and bills per token

Retrieved chunks get pasted into the prompt as context. The LLM bills every token it reads. Each chunk costs the same whether it held the answer or was just nearby noise.

The trade-off is choosing which chunks to send. Too few, and you miss the answer, but with too many, you pay to ship noise.
01 The problem

Standard RAG ships 50 chunks to the LLM. Usually only one matters.

Every query ships all 50 retrieved chunks, relevant or not. At 256 tokens each, you pay for the whole wall on every request.

The one ★ gold chunk that holds the answer is a single square in it. And even paying for all 50, dense retrieval still misses the answer more than 25% of the time.

0tokens shipped / query
chunks held the answer
Every square = one 256-token chunk billed to your LLM
02 The fix

Search wider. Send less.

One Dell PowerEdge R470 drops in between your vector store and your LLM, making retrieval smarter before a single token is billed.

1

Cast a wider net

Retrieve 100 candidates instead of 50. A bigger pool lifts the recall ceiling from 74% to 82%.

2

Rerank on the R470

A cross-encoder on Intel® Xeon 6 with AMX re-scores all 100 against the question in milliseconds, purely on CPU.

3

Send only the best 10

Only the top 10 go to the LLM: 2,560 tokens instead of 12,800, answer in front.

03 The proof

10 reranked chunks beat 50 dense chunks.

Measured on 300 queries with known answers. The curve shows the share of queries where the gold chunk made it into the context, at every cutoff K.

Answer-found rate vs. chunks sent (K)
Reranked (R470) Dense only
Drag K to watch quality vs. cost
sending 10 chunks per query
Reranked
Dense only
tokens billed / query at this K 2,560

The same lift, at your volume.

300,000 queries/day
10K250K500K750K1M
$0
saved per year on input tokens
Standard
$0
Intelligent
$0
computed from the observed recall + your model pricing
How these numbers are computed

Standard RAG. Dense retrieval at K=50 sends all 50 chunks to the LLM. At 256 tokens per chunk that is 12,800 input tokens per query, with a measured answer-found rate of 74.0%.

Intelligent RAG. Dense retrieval at K=100 casts a wider net, the R470 reranks all 100, and only the top 10 go to the LLM: 2,560 input tokens per query, with a measured answer-found rate of 77.3%.

The calculator multiplies the per-query token delta (10,240 tokens) by your daily volume, 365 days, and the selected model's input-token price. Output tokens, identical in both pipelines, are excluded.

04 Watch it happen

The benchmark, replayed query by query.

Real questions, real retrieval ranks, real rerank scores, replayed from the benchmark log. Both pipelines get the same question at the same moment. Follow the ★ gold chunk, the one that holds the answer.

Loading benchmark data…
05 The platform

One server turns wide search into narrow spend.

The Dell PowerEdge R470 sits between your vector store and your LLM, optimizing your RAG token usage.

Where the R470 fits in the retrieval flow A query goes to a vector store, which returns 100 candidate chunks to the Dell PowerEdge R470 reranker. The reranker forwards only the top 10 chunks to the LLM; the other 90 are never billed. YOUR APP asks a question VECTOR STORE top-100 by similarity 100 candidate chunks every query · wide on purpose DELL POWEREDGE R470 CROSS-ENCODER RERANK Intel® Xeon 6 + AMX · milliseconds top 10 only · 2,560 tokens ANY LLM cloud or on-prem
Intel Xeon

Intel Xeon 6 with Intel® AMX

Advanced Matrix Extensions run the cross-encoder directly on CPU at production throughput.z

Drop-in, vendor-neutral

Sits between any vector store and any LLM backend, with no pipeline rewrite and no model migration. It only touches the chunk list.

Built for fleet throughput

High core counts and memory bandwidth keep rerank latency low, providing a fast user expereince as documents grow.

A data-governance boundary

Retrieve and rerank against your corpus locally, sending a smaller subset of data outside your walls.

Spend tokens where they matter.

Turn "ship everything" into "ship what matters," and let the savings compound every day.